MARBLES, LOSS OF:
It is
generally supposed, among those who know me, that I have lost my marbles. This is not strictly true, as far as the metaphor
goes, because I never had any marbles to begin with. Also, metaphors aside, I did have some marbles once, when I was young. And I didn’t lose them, though I don’t have
them at the moment and I don’t know where they are. This is due to a peculiar quirk of linguistics,
which I will illustrate below.
If you
have a cat, and it goes away, you do not necessarily have what would be called
a ‘lost cat.’ Indeed, you have no kind
of cat at all. However, if you remain
adequately indifferent to the cat’s absence, the cat cannot truly be called
lost.
It is simply not present. Lostness
is an insubstantal and entirely subjective quality of an object.
The
single exception to this schema is when you personally become lost. This is inevitable, regardless of your capacity
for indifference. Some people, when asked
where they’re going, reply that they’re going off to find themselves.
One would surmise that they’re lost.
However, because they take themselves on the journey to find themselves,
we can deduce that they are not truly lost, only bored.
Tolerance
for boredom is a quality that is intrinsically, culturally deflationary. That is to say, the degree of nothingness (sometimes
called, by Continental philosophers, The Absence of Somethingness) that people of a given generation can
tolerate before being rendered entirely bored goes down over time.
For
example, “Marbles” was a popular game before the advent of electronic gaming
technology. I don’t know exactly how
it was played, but my general feeling is that you kind of knocked the marbles
around with your thumb, and something about an ‘Aggie,’ which is a slang abbreviation
for a certain kind of marble, a particularly good one. My thinnish understanding of the game is a product
of the very boredom-tolerance dynamic that I previously described.
This
is because I had marbles, at one time,
as I mentioned, but nobody ever taught me how to use them. I had a big bag of them, and it made a great
marbly sound when you picked it up. Inside
was a bunch of marbles. They were all
different, but only in the relatively boring and shiftless way that snowflakes
are different. I think my grandparents
probably gave them to me. There were
no instructions in the bag, and this was before the advent of the internet,
which, as with all subjects, has a 50% chance of containing information about
marbles that is not directly related to pornography.
I feel
I must interrupt this relatively straightforward missive with news from the
television: If you have thirty dollars’ worth of good credit, you can obtain
through the mail an inflatable mattress and a small spray-bottle of a substance
that keeps you from snoring. This may
enable many previously hapless people to enter relatively high society.
Imagine this conversation: A man has just asked a woman to have sex with
him. They’re in a bar or something.
Man:
I swear, it’ll be great.
Woman: Well, I don’t know... do you have a bed?
Man: Yep!
Woman: Do you snore?
Man: Nope!
Woman: How’s your credit?
[etc].
Sex
has always been better than marbles, and this will continue to be the case,
with marbles falling further behind sex in the boredom continuum every day.
This is because sex, on average, never becomes any more boring, particularly
when compared with marbles.
I don’t
really have sex anymore, for obvious reasons. Imagine, if you will, this conversation (I’m
in a bar or something):
Me: Hey, do you want to have sex?
Woman: Well, I don’t know... do you have a bed?
Me: Yep!
Woman: Do you snore?
Me: Well, I don’t know, because nobody will sleep
with me, so, you know, nobody is ever around to tell me if I snore or not. I suppose I could tape-record myself sleeping...
but that would be kind of creepy. Okay,
how about this: I’ll do a quick experiment...
Woman: Have you lost your marbles?
Me: Strictly speaking, no. It’s kind of a linguistic quirk. You see, lost
is...
[etc].